ABSTRACT
Background/Aims@#Combination of midazolam and opioids is used widely for endoscopic sedation. Compared with meperidine, fentanyl is reportedly associated with rapid recovery, turnover rate of endoscopy room, and quality of endoscopy. We compared fentanyl with meperidine when combined with midazolam for sedative colonoscopy. @*Methods@#A retrospective, cross-sectional, 1:2 matching study was conducted. Induction and recovery time were compared as the primary outcomes. Moreover, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total procedure time of colonoscopy, paradoxical reaction, adenoma detection rate, and adverse effect of midazolam or opioids were assessed as the secondary outcomes. @*Results@#A total of 129 subjects (43 fentanyl vs. 86 meperidine) were included in the analysis. The fentanyl group showed significantly more rapid induction time (4.5±2.7 min vs. 7.5±4.7 min, p<0.001), but longer recovery time (59.5±25.6 min vs. 50.3±10.9 min, p=0.030) than the meperidine group. In multivariate analysis, the induction time of the fentanyl group was 3.40 min faster (p<0.001), but the recovery time was 6.38 min longer (p=0.046) than that of the meperidine group. There was no difference in withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate between the two groups. @*Conclusions@#The fentanyl group had more rapid sedation induction time but longer recovery time than the meperidine group.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Antimicrobials for nosocomial infections are generally chosen discriminately from community-acquired diseases from concerns for resistance to which the elderly are highly exposed. The elderly are affected frequently by acute cholecystitis (AC), for which appropriate antimicrobial therapy is particularly important. Also, cholecystectomy for elderly patients with co-morbidities is expectedly not as feasible as for uncomplicated young patients. Characteristics of hospital-acquired AC in the elderly patients were investigated in this study. METHODS: Records of patients over 65 years and older diagnosed with AC between March 2006 and February 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Hospital-acquired AC was defined as development of AC in patients who were admitted for other disorders. Community-acquired AC was defined as presence of AC at the time of admission. Community-acquired AC group (CG) was used as a control group that was matched for age and sex with a ratio of 1:2. RESULTS: There were 40 patients in hospital-acquired AC group (HG) and 80 in CG. Demographics did not differ except higher prevalence of underlying illnesses in HG. Necessity to change initial antimicrobials for worsening conditions was more common in HG than in CG (20.0% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.01). Time to recovery was longer in HG (23.3 ± 5.6 days vs. 10.1 ± 0.7 days, p = 0.02). Rate of early cholecystectomy was lower (7.5% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01) and that of open conversion was higher (20.0% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.02) in HG. CONCLUSIONS: For the elderly patients with hospital-acquired AC, antimicrobial and surgical management should be performed more meticulously since they showed distinct characteristics.